First thing to record, our group has finished assignment 1. Cheers!
Although we were not confident with all of the answers, at least we made effort.
Come back to the learning part, I have to say logic trapped me up.
Converse, negation... my head is crowded with these stuff. Every time I try to write or speak a sentence, my head sets up automatically to translate it into different modes. I don't know if any other poor student has the same symptom as me.
One part from the lectures, Venn diagram, I have no idea how it help understand expressions. I think it's much harder to combine these two systems.
csc 165 h1 2014 fall
Friday 3 October 2014
Friday 19 September 2014
Hmmmm
Well, at the very beginning, I have to claim studying CSC165 is much better than what I imagined. Compared to CSC148, which I am taking at the mean time, this course is said to be lovely. Because you do not have to spend whole days staring at the screen to find a tiny bug. Mercy!
To be honest, instead of going to the first week lectures, I kept enjoying my vocation thanks to the allure and charm of sunny weather. So when I hurriedly tried to catch up second week classes, the bad consequence is, every time when dear Professor raised a question around "if P, then Q", then Q to P, then ¬Q to ¬P, my mind got totally messed up, 'what sort of logic is that?'
After spending time considering this kind questions, I still have a point jammed.
'Successful programming requires skill', this is a sample sentence given in class slides.
How could 'successful programming' be P? In my opinion, 'skill' is the precondition in this case.
Many thanks if someone could help me solving this problem.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)